Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of Dimethylformamide (DMF) as an Organic Modifier in Hydrophobicity Index (Rm) Determination

Olakunle S Idowu , Adedigbo A Fasanmade, Ajibola A Olaniyi

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ibadan, Nigeria;

For correspondence:-  Olakunle Idowu   Email: olakunleid@yahoo.com   Tel:+ 234 802 309 4981

Published: 23 December 2002

Citation: Idowu OS, Fasanmade AA, Olaniyi AA. Evaluation of Dimethylformamide (DMF) as an Organic Modifier in Hydrophobicity Index (Rm) Determination. Trop J Pharm Res 2002; 1(2):83-89 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v1i2.5

© 2002 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose:  Ideal  behaviour  of  mixtures  of  organic  modifier  and  water  is  reflected by  a  linear relationship between  refractive  index  and  fraction of  organic  modifier  in  the  mixture.  This study  was carried out to  investigate dimethylformamide  (DMF)  as  an organic  modifier  in hydrophobicity index (Rm ) determination.
Method:  We quantitatively  evaluated  the problem  of  partial  miscibility  of  phases  associated with  the  reversed phase  thin  layer  chromatographic  (RPTLC)  system,  using  liquid paraffin as stationary  phase and acetone/water  mixtures  as  mobile phase. Ideality  of  behaviour  of acetone  /water  mixtures  was  investigated by  refractive  index  measurements.  Rm values  of compounds were determined using mixtures of acetone and water as mobile phase.
Results:  DMF/water  mixture behaved  ideally  across  the  whole  concentration  range investigated  (0-100%)  while acetone/water  mixture deviated  from  ideal  behaviour  when  the concentration of acetone in the mixture was 80%.  DMF also gave a better extrapolation of Rm value from linear regression of  partition data than acetone for  bezafibrate used as a test-drug molecule.
Conclusion:  DMF  is  a better  organic  modifier  than acetone  in  this  RPTLC  system.  These findings could be extended  to drug-receptor  and drug design  studies.  The use of dimethylformamide  (DMF)  in preference  to acetone as  organic  modifier  is  proposed  in  this study.

Keywords: Drug design, dimethylformamide, hydrophobicity index, organic modifiers

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates